What about FULL SCORM conformance?
Posted on September 20 2005 by Dr Newman
in reponse to THINQ and Macromedia integrate products using AICC, SCORM
I find it frustrating to see these authoring packages claiming to be fully conformant - am I right in thinking that actually they are only conformant to the run-time specifications? Dreamweaver seems to provide an imsmanifest.xml file, but no one seems to provide courses that are fully xml-tagged (ie all assets, SCOs and content packages are described). How do these providers get away with being marketed - including by CETIS - as fully conformant?
Replies to this post: