skip to main page content CETIS: Click here to return to the homepage
the centre for educational technology interoperability standards

skip over the long navigation bar
Home
News
Features
Events
Forums
Reference
Briefings
Press centre

Inside Cetis
what is Cetis?
Contact us
Cetis staff
Jobs at CETIS


 




Syndication
XML: Click here to get the news as an RSS XML file XML: Click here to get the news as an Atom XML file iCAL: Click here to get the events as an iCalendar file

Background
what are learning technology standards?
who's involved?
who's doing what?

CETIS Groups
what are cetis groups?
what difference can they make?
Assessment SIG
Educational Content SIG
Enterprise SIG
Metadata SIG
Life Long Learning Group
Portfolio SIG
Accessibility Group
Pedagogy Forum
Developer's forum

Subjects
Accessibility (310)
Assessment (74)
Content (283)
Metadata (195)
Pedagogy (34)
Profile (138)
Tools (197)
For Developers (569)
For Educators (344)
For Managers (339)
For Members (584)
SCORM (118)
AICC (18)
CEN (34)
DCMI (36)
EML (47)
IEEE (79)
IMS (302)
ISO (21)
OAI (24)
OKI (20)
PROMETEUS (12)
W3C (37)

print this article (opens in new window) view printer-friendly version (opens in new window)

IMS ACCLIP is a public draft

The IMS Accessibility for the Learner Information Profile has entered the public draft stage. Barring some very unusual happenings, the document will provide the basis for a means of storing learner's preferences for how they want or need to access learning content.

Compared to the base document that has been out for a while, there are a few changes. Most notably, there is the introduction of a new 'accommodation' element within the 'eligibility' element, separate from the 'accessForAll' element where all the other access preferences are.

There is a good reason for 'accommodation's rather separate place, as it neither stores preferences, nor information about the learner per se. Instead, it is a place for administrators to store information about the kinds of accommodation a particular learner needs when interacting with a specific learning object.

Because it is not intended to be under the learner's control, the separate place within the LIP makes it easy to control different peoples' access to different parts of the LIP record; learners still have full access to their 'accessForAll' preferences, but not 'eligibility - accommodation', and the reverse for administrators.

The 'accommodation' element is particularly important for assessment, because some accessibility technology can simply defeat the objective of specific kinds of tests. A dyslexic person, for example, may normally use a spell checker, but would not be eligible to do so when taking a spelling test. The 'accommodation' entry in that learner's LIP can store that particular exception for that particular test, and no more. Each new learning object with an accessibility restiction needs a new entry.

Not that the 'accommodation' element is all about preventing the use of accessibility technology; it is also the place to store more procedural information like the fact that a learner who needs a screen reader should be put in a separate room when taking an exam, to prevent disturbing others.

While this is all sensible stuff, it also demonstrates that not all e-learning accessbility issues can be solved by just allowing the learner to store functional preferences, and entirely avoid other people's judgments of the learner affecting the way they interact with e-learning material. Still, the very clear separation between 'accessForAll' and 'accommodation' makes it clear what is going on.

Perhaps more importantly, the fact that the 'accommodation' element is the only exception to the learner controlled, functionally defined nature of the ACCLIP work is actually quite remarkable. Quite a few other systems for storing information (electronic or otherwise) about accessibility needs have gone down the path of storing other people's judgments about what a learner can and cannot do, which is inevitably highly controversial and often inaccurate and out of date.

Other changes to the ACCLIP don't add much completely new functionality, but implement it more cleanly. 'Context', for example, is now all-encompassing. This means that all your access preferences, including preferred language, can be defined in context specific sets that are completely independent of each other.

The ACCLIP documents can be found on the IMS website.

Related items:

Comments:

No responses have been posted

copyright cetis.ac.uk
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

syndication |publisher's statement |contact us |privacy policy

 go to start of page content