skip to main page content CETIS: Click here to return to the homepage
the centre for educational technology interoperability standards

skip over the long navigation bar
Press centre

Inside Cetis
what is Cetis?
Contact us
Cetis staff
Jobs at CETIS


XML: Click here to get the news as an RSS XML file XML: Click here to get the news as an Atom XML file iCAL: Click here to get the events as an iCalendar file

what are learning technology standards?
who's involved?
who's doing what?

CETIS Groups
what are cetis groups?
what difference can they make?
Assessment SIG
Educational Content SIG
Enterprise SIG
Metadata SIG
Life Long Learning Group
Portfolio SIG
Accessibility Group
Pedagogy Forum
Developer's forum

Accessibility (310)
Assessment (74)
Content (283)
Metadata (195)
Pedagogy (34)
Profile (138)
Tools (197)
For Developers (569)
For Educators (344)
For Managers (339)
For Members (584)
SCORM (118)
AICC (18)
CEN (34)
DCMI (36)
EML (47)
IEEE (79)
IMS (302)
ISO (21)
OAI (24)
OKI (20)
W3C (37)

print this article (opens in new window) view printer-friendly version (opens in new window)

Course identifier standardisation work started

Before you can say or do anything with a course, you have to be sure which one you're talking about. Since most institutions, or even departments, refer to courses in different ways, this leads to problems when sharing access.

For that reason, the Middleware Architecture Committee for Education (MACE) of US academic institutions that partcipate in Internet2 have started developing a schema that will make the identifiers interoperable.

The work will be done in consultation with OKI, and the solution will comply with IMS specifications (mainly Enterprise).

The problem area is really one of sharing access to a course. For commercial or legal reasons, the materials that are available for students can't be just wacked onto the web, for the world to see. So some means needs to be found of making sure that only those who are enrolled in a course can see the material.

One part of that puzzle is authenticating students properly (i.e. making sure that someone is who the say they are), and then authorizing them (checking whether Jane Doe has a right of access to a resources). A lot of this is already taken of in systems like Shibboleth- the Internet2 standard for authentication and authorisation.

But Shibboleth -or other systems like the UK's Angel or Athens- need to know about courses before it can automatically authenticate Jane Doe to access some confidential statistics from the Home Office for her Immigration Law course.

This is not a problem if Immigration Law is just offered by one University department for its own students. It becomes a bit more hairy when the same course is offered as part of a different degree in the same institution, or as part of a degree from a different institution.

Hence the fact that any standardised solution to the problem ought to be of interest to UK FE colleges and HE institutions that participate in shared courses or who are looking for the sort of life long learning integratation advocated in the recent government white paper.

There are uses of standardised course identifiers beyond access control, though. Once a scheme is in place in a number of institutions, tasks like curriculum analysis and developement, or even the building of course taxonomies for a particular discipline becomes much more tractable.

Which, in turn, makes the UK wide move to a standardised UK learner profile yet more useful. If a student's transcript contains a reference to a known, uniquely identified course, whose relation to other courses in the same domain is known, the amount of relevant information available to a different college, university or employer is that much bigger.

More information on the MACE-2 courseID initiative is available from the internet2 middleware pages

Related items:


Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

syndication |publisher's statement |contact us |privacy policy

 go to start of page content