skip to main page content CETIS: Click here to return to the homepage
the centre for educational technology interoperability standards

skip over the long navigation bar
Home
News
Features
Events
Forums
Reference
Briefings
Press centre

Inside Cetis
what is Cetis?
Contact us
Cetis staff
Jobs at CETIS


 




Syndication
XML: Click here to get the news as an RSS XML file XML: Click here to get the news as an Atom XML file iCAL: Click here to get the events as an iCalendar file

Background
what are learning technology standards?
who's involved?
who's doing what?

CETIS Groups
what are cetis groups?
what difference can they make?
Assessment SIG
Educational Content SIG
Enterprise SIG
Metadata SIG
Life Long Learning Group
Portfolio SIG
Accessibility Group
Pedagogy Forum
Developer's forum

Subjects
Accessibility (310)
Assessment (74)
Content (283)
Metadata (195)
Pedagogy (34)
Profile (138)
Tools (197)
For Developers (569)
For Educators (344)
For Managers (339)
For Members (584)
SCORM (118)
AICC (18)
CEN (34)
DCMI (36)
EML (47)
IEEE (79)
IMS (302)
ISO (21)
OAI (24)
OKI (20)
PROMETEUS (12)
W3C (37)

Open source/Open standards?

Posted on September 11 2003 by James Dalziel in reponse to The Open Source Portfolio Initiative releases 1.0

Just a comment on the quote "Even if you don't agree with Dalziel's suggestion that open standards are best supported by closed source software" from this article.

The point I try to make in the referenced article is that we don't yet know which approach to software development (proprietary "closed" source versus open source) is more likely to lead to open standards conformant systems. The article discusses pros and cons on both sides, but in particular it notes that the financial model of closed source software development may make it easier to implement open standards due to ongoing revenue streams which can be used for the expensive work of standards implementation. In an open source context, other forms of income or support are required to ensure this work is done.

My point is not that closed source does this better, but rather that we don't yet know which model is more likely to consistently produce open standards conformant systems. In practice, the answer will probably be different in each area depending on the nature of the closed source companies and the state of the open source developer community. What interests me is the overarching question of which approach to software development is more likely to lead to interoperable systems.


In passing, I should note that when I wrote this paper in April/May of this year, it was a "theoretical" exercise for me - I wasn't writing this with a particular example of this challenge in mind. Subsequent developments over the year have made this a far more "real" question for me, and the outcome of this may be quite ironic in the context of the quote above. ;-)

Replies to this post:

copyright cetis.ac.uk
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

syndication |publisher's statement |contact us |privacy policy

 go to start of page content